Zaymiey

🧪 Chemistry  ·  Haloalkanes & Haloarenes  ·  NEET & JEE

In Nucleophilic Substitution, a polar protic solvent stabilises the leaving group (anion) but also stabilises the nucleophile. Its overall effect on SN2 rate compared to polar aprotic solvent is:

Answer: Rate is slower in polar protic solvent because the nucleophile is heavily solvated and less reactive.

  • A Rate is much faster in polar protic solvent because the leaving group is destabilised instead
  • B Rate is slower in polar protic solvent because the nucleophile is heavily solvated and less reactive
  • C The rate stays exactly identical regardless of which solvent type is chosen
  • D Polar protic solvent always forces the mechanism to switch completely from SN2 to SN1

Correct answer: B. Rate is slower in polar protic solvent because the nucleophile is heavily solvated and less reactive

Explanation: In polar protic solvents, the nucleophile forms strong hydrogen bonds with the solvent, reducing its reactivity. SN2 reactions are much faster in polar aprotic solvents (DMF, DMSO, acetone) where the nucleophile is free.

SN2: one stepNu-CX-backside attackNuC+ X-Inversion of configuration(Walden inversion)SN1: two stepsCX-slow: leaving group exits+CcarbocationNu-Planar intermediate givesracemisation (both faces attacked)

SN2 proceeds in a single step with backside attack and inversion of configuration, while SN1 forms a planar carbocation intermediate first, leading to racemisation.

Concept context

Study carbon-halogen compounds: how they are made, how they react via SN1/SN2 and elimination, their stereochemistry, and their environmental impact.

Read the full Haloalkanes & Haloarenes notes →